The Impact of GA SB119 on Family Systems
| Updated: Sept 18th, 2024 |
Democrats introduced Georgia Senate Bill 119 in 2023 to prohibit the possession of guns by people initially convicted of a misdemeanour in family violence (LegiScan, 2023). The call to action is to reduce access, ban transportation, and intercept possession of the artilleries by vulnerable groups. GA SB119 protects family systems, which suffer the most when they lose children in K-12 institutions. Based on the family systems theory, the institution is an intricate communal structure, which allows members to influence each other’s behaviours through interactions (Haefner, 2014). Primarily, an interconnected community with patterned behaviours constitutes a family, and gun violence in K-12 schools affects such systems.
Get a custom essay on Impact of GA SB119 on Family Systems
Claims-making on the Policy
1.Georgia Senate Bill 119 is a partisan bill that enjoys support from 22 Democratic legislatures. Sen. Gloria Butler is one of the sponsors who can make claims on the policy through critical incidents, public opinion, and convergence of claims. 2.Butler can insist that the protection of K-12 schools is a critical incident worth immediate attention because of the increased number of deaths associated with terrorist attacks in such learning institutions. According to the National Education Association (NEA, 2023), families have lost 4,300 children to gun violence in schools since 2020. It means that gun violence requires an emergency response through a sound policy. Public opinion is another essential aspect of claims-making, which requires the attention of an influential person with a history of closeness with people. Butler can leverage her public reputation as an enthusiast on children’s issues (‘Senate Press Office,’ 2019). 3.She can use the influence to rally support from like-minded Americans. Finally, Butler can focus on the convergence of claims and gather various opinions on gun violence in American schools to build a strong case for the policy. As a volunteer with Positive Growth, Butler interacts with several 11 to 17-year-olds who understand the implications of gun violence in K-12 schools (‘Senate Press Office,’ 2019). Butler can take advantage of the three components to make claims in support of the bill.
1. I don’t like how this sentence is worded. Please change it.
2. If your going to say this you have to back up this claim with a accurate resource. If you cant find a source then you need to replace this sentence.
3. I don’t like this sentence
Determination of Eligibility
The beneficiaries of the policy are 1.families, which encompass communities with almost similar behavioral patterns. K-12 learners are children who deserve protection from gun violence. Chapin (2014) argues that effective social policies prioritize children’s needs. Thus, GA SB119’s benefits depend on how well they meet the needs of children whose eligibility is determined by their association with K-12 education. Families are eligible because gun violence related to such institutions is the threshold for determining who should possess the weapons or not. When school-going children feel protected, their families experience safety and comfort.
1.Is it just the families who will benefit from this policy? Or can the community benefit as well?
State Assistance
1.Eligible populations can access state assistance to stop gun violence in K-12 schools. 2.NEA (2023) explains that K-12 schools are entitled to safety training including drills for teenage students who can exercise self-protection during attacks. Nonetheless, state authorities can reinforce the support offered by passing legislation to allow trained and eligible teachers to access guns for a response if invaders attack their institutions. An expansion of state funding for the Department of Homeland Security can help allocate an agency to handle the issue and protection children in learning facilities.
1. Who is the eligible population? Be more specific.
2. Put the full name
Barriers
1.One of the barriers is opposition by Republican legislatures. This group can argue that not all family violence cases increase the risk of attacks in K-12 schools. Others might not support the resolution of allowing teachers to possess guns in school since some could have a history of family violence. Notably, the opposition will likely be limited by a lack of sound evidence.
1. This section needs some support and evidence
References
